Building a Framework of Evaluating Human-Environment Relationships: Considering the Differences between Subjective Evaluations and Objective Assessments
Liu Ying2,3; Deng Wei1,2,3; Peng Li2,3
刊名SUSTAINABILITY
2020
卷号12期号:1页码:167
关键词human-environment relationship indicator environment-oriented approach subject-oriented approach
DOI10.3390/su12010167
通讯作者Liu, Ying(liuying@imde.ac.cn) ; Deng, Wei(dengwei@imde.ac.cn)
产权排序2
文献子类Article
英文摘要The human-environment relationship is bidirectional, meaning that human attitudes and behavior to nature are at the root of environmental change, while changes in the environment affect human attitudes and behavior. It is necessary to analyze the human-environment relationship from two aspects: (a) Whether there is a good objective basis for maintaining an environment, and (b) whether people report that they are satisfied with that environment. This study attempted to construct a framework to evaluate the human-environment relationship considering these two aspects. The framework consists of three parts: Traditional evaluation, indicator construction, and evaluation considering the relationship between subjective and objective assessment. Traditional evaluations consist of subjective evaluations and objective assessments. Indicator construction focuses on putting forward indicators that quantitively evaluate the human-environment relationship, considering the results of objective assessments and subjective evaluations. The indicators introduced in this study include MD (match degree) and OSC (objective assessment and subjective evaluation comparison) to explain the difference and the relationship between objective assessments and subjective evaluations of the environment. Then, based on the indicator value, a matrix containing four situations (Match-H, Match-L, H-L, and L-H) was constructed to explore why a human-environment relationship may not be harmonious. Since the upper Minjiang River basin is a typical area, because of its intensive human activity, as well as its fragile ecological environment, this study chose it as a case study and used it to verify the framework. Through the framework construction and application, this study found that: (1) The framework of this study provided a more comprehensive method to evaluate the human-environment relationship; (2) as the subjective evaluation was based on individual comprehensive tradeoffs, the evaluation combining the subjective and objective assessment was more accurate; (3) environmental conditions were the basis, and human activities were the key factors, for the coordination of human-environment relationships; so the matrix put forward in this study was necessary for finding the cause of human-environment incongruity.
电子版国际标准刊号2071-1050
资助项目National Natural Science Foundation of China[41801140] ; CAS light of west China program
WOS关键词QUALITY-OF-LIFE ; SUSTAINABILITY
WOS研究方向Science & Technology - Other Topics ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
语种英语
出版者MDPI
WOS记录号WOS:000521955600167
资助机构National Natural Science Foundation of China ; CAS light of west China program
内容类型期刊论文
源URL[http://ir.imde.ac.cn/handle/131551/34140]  
专题成都山地灾害与环境研究所_山区发展研究中心
通讯作者Liu Ying; Deng Wei
作者单位1.Collage of Resource and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100190, China
2.College of Geography and Resources, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101, China;
3.Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Science, Chengdu 610041, China;
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Liu Ying,Deng Wei,Peng Li. Building a Framework of Evaluating Human-Environment Relationships: Considering the Differences between Subjective Evaluations and Objective Assessments[J]. SUSTAINABILITY,2020,12(1):167.
APA Liu Ying,Deng Wei,&Peng Li.(2020).Building a Framework of Evaluating Human-Environment Relationships: Considering the Differences between Subjective Evaluations and Objective Assessments.SUSTAINABILITY,12(1),167.
MLA Liu Ying,et al."Building a Framework of Evaluating Human-Environment Relationships: Considering the Differences between Subjective Evaluations and Objective Assessments".SUSTAINABILITY 12.1(2020):167.
个性服务
查看访问统计
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。


©版权所有 ©2017 CSpace - Powered by CSpace